Listen on Apple Podcasts

Positive Sarcasm Presents: “Me. Myself. & I. (Lindsay Clancy Op-Ed)”

Positive Sarcasm Presents: “Me. Myself. & I. (Lindsay Clancy Op-Ed)”
Positive Sarcasm

Imagine this beautiful creature. I've nurtured him, fed him, trained him, loved him and disintigrated my enitre 401k for him.

Imagine he's your son or daughter, no older than 9 years old or as young as 8/9 months.

These hands...designed to provide assistance, guidance, relief, warmth, reassurance.

Imagine them just tightening around their fragile little neck. Their eye just reflecting an extreme amount of confusion, pain and panic.

Now, allegedly after the first child became lifeless, this crazy bitch decided to turn this tragic situation that she's physically responsible for, into a mass casualty incident, by murdering the other two children in the same manner.

Do you understand that if the police were to have entered the home while the murders were in progress, if they discovered actual strangulation in progress, the use of deadly force would be fully authorized as an option under Mass state RSA. Your argument could be that other than some gym resistance bands, she was not in possession of a weapon such as a gun or knife, however the child is a mere seconds away from death, there is no other option.

This isn't a psychosis, this is a blood rage.

Psychological Concept: In health and psychology, blood rage refers to a state of extreme anger and aggression that can lead to violent behavior. It is characterized by a loss of control and tunnel vision, often triggered by stress, frustration, or perceived threats, and can negatively impact both mental and physical health.

Blame the meds:

A 2022 update of the Mass Shooter Database found that out of 182 cases, only 43 had ever been prescribed psychiatric medications, and only 34 had known mental health treatment in the six months prior [7]. A separate study of 48 school and college shooters found that only 6 (12.5%) were taking medication at the time of their attacks [8].

You wanna blame the meds, the doctors she was seeing, the husband for whatever dumb conspiratoral reason, you go right ahead, it only makes you look stupid and without self awareness.

I'm not on this woman's side in any scenario that you can pose. Little human beings incapable of defending themselves, calling for help, Just confusion, then pain, then panic, then heaven.

Maybe the system failed Lindsey Clancy, but she failed her children, her husband and her community, that falls entirely on her shoulders.

Now let's turn our attention towards the mob of retards in pink.

Every single one of those supporters that brought there children to the rally should be reported to DCF.

Who it serves: Children ages 0–21 (and young adults up to age 23 who aged out of foster care) who are at risk of or have been victims of abuse or neglect, along with their families.

Every single one of them should be at the very least reported and documented for attending a rally. I will not advocate for reporting them if they funded her defense legal fees, cus that is a very slippery slope, but bringing your children to a rally of this is certainly questionable behavior.

So if the Women of Massachussets want to set a ridiculous precedent regarding this matter such as:

⦁ She was in a mental psychosis do to her medication.

⦁ She was not responsible due to her current hormonal state.

First off, if a man commited this crime, he'd be in prison for the rest of his life or dead.

But if you wanna talk crazy, then lets have some fun!

If Lindsey Clancy is retried and ultimately acquitted of these atrocities, then I believe the women of Massachussets should forfeit the following rights, simply due to mental and hormonal issues:

⦁ The right to vote, this includes local, state and Federal elections of any kinds. I don't even want them voting on American Idol.

⦁ Ownership of a firearm would be strictly prohibited.

⦁ Jobs: Anything that effects the welfare of a child. This includes the following - Healthcare, Schools, Babysitting, Dogsitting, Daycare, Pilots or any transportation services, food or nutrition services, Hair Salons that service anyone under the age of 18. Basically anything that involves contact with children or affects their welfare.

⦁ Public Service: This would include Police, Fire, National Guard, School Board, Town Officials, Mayors and of course, running for Governor.

Sorry, but if merely having your period coincides with the precedents that you've set because of this potential verdict, then whatever Alpha Males are left in the state will have no choice but to be responsible for the well being of all Massachusetts children.

Now if you don't agree with this and you wan't escape the noose that I've recommended for this stupid state, then you are free to move, however you'll have to sign a document stating you are opposed to the court verdict and that you will put your children in high regard and you won't push them into oncoming traffic if the barista at Starbucks get's order order wrong.

Sounds disgusting right? Sounds draconian and patronizing? Sounds morally reprehensible right? CORRECT! YOU'd BE CORRECT, but so is strangling all three of little children one by one with a piece of gym equipment while your husband is off at the grocery store.

In a state where abortion is now legal all the way up to the moment of birth, it now seems that that "hey, that's not far enough! Now children can come with a return policy, refundable up to the age of 10. Now if you don't like your 5-year old, they can be placed in a kill shelter right next to a Border Collie

You people fucking disgust me and you alone have invalidated yourselves of human worthy of holding the same amount of rights and priviliges as I and that includes having a rational conversation. You threw that out the window...just like lindsey Clancy did and it's a shame she survived, because her children didn't.